Requests as tracked tickets
Every request becomes a ticket with a status, so jobs are tracked to closure.
Maintenance services ERP that runs the reactive and recurring work — requests as tracked tickets, the technicians and spare parts to close them, procurement to replenish, and cost against the client.
Maintenance work arrives from everywhere and gets closed with parts nobody logged. A request comes by phone, a technician fixes it with a part off the van, and the connection between the job, the labour, and the spare used is never made — so recurring jobs slip, parts run out unnoticed, and the cost of serving a client is a mystery. Farexa makes the ticket the anchor: every request is tracked with a status, the technician is assigned to it, and the parts used are issued against it from stock.
Reactive and recurring work live in the same system. A breakdown and a scheduled service are both tickets in one queue, so planned maintenance doesn't get crowded out by firefighting. Spare parts are issued against the job from inventory and replenished through controlled procurement, and workforce deployment records which technician did what — so the labour, the parts, and the job are one record, and cost rolls up against the client.
It's the difference between a maintenance operation that reacts and one that's run: requests tracked to closure, technicians and parts coordinated on the job, recurring service scheduled, and the cost of serving each client visible instead of guessed.
Every request becomes a ticket with a status, so jobs are tracked to closure.
Assign technicians to jobs and see who's on what.
Issue parts against the ticket from inventory, so material use is on the job.
Breakdowns and scheduled service are both tickets, so planned work isn't crowded out.
Replenish spares through controlled purchasing when stock runs down.
Record which technician did what, with attendance behind the hours.
Labour and parts roll up per client, so the cost of service is visible.
Clients can raise a request and follow it without an account.
Yes. Reactive breakdowns and recurring scheduled service are both tickets in one queue, so planned maintenance isn't crowded out by firefighting — they're run in the same system.
Yes. Parts are issued against the ticket from inventory, so the spare used is recorded on the job, and procurement replenishes stock through controlled purchasing when it runs down — no more parts vanishing off the van unlogged.
Yes. Labour and parts roll up per client, so the cost of service is visible rather than a mystery — which is what tells you whether an annual maintenance contract is priced right.
Yes. Requests from any channel become tracked tickets, and guests can raise and follow a request without an account, so nothing depends on someone remembering a phone call.
Usually Support Tickets and Inventory to get the request queue and spare parts in order, then Workforce, Procurement, and Analytics as technician deployment and cost-per-client fill in.
Book a walkthrough with your own clients and parts, and see requests tracked to closure with cost per client.