Cost against the project
Purchasing, labour, plant, and expenses all post to the project, so cost is a running figure.
Construction ERP that pulls site procurement, labour, plant, and expenses onto one project — so material orders, crew days, fuel, and supplier invoices add up to a cost you can see while there's still time to act on it.
On a construction project, the money leaves in a dozen directions at once — materials ordered from site, a crew that changes week to week, plant and fuel, subcontractor invoices — and it usually isn't added up until the job is done and the margin is whatever's left. By then it's too late to do anything about it. Farexa's answer is to make the project the thing everything posts to: purchasing, labour, plant, and expenses all land against it, so project cost is a running number rather than a post-mortem.
Purchasing from site gets the control it usually lacks. A purchase request becomes a purchase order with approval before it's committed, goods are received against it, and the supplier invoice is checked against what was ordered and delivered before it's paid — so the classic leaks, buying without authority and paying for what never arrived, are closed. Manpower deployment tracks who was on which site, plant and vehicles carry their fuel and maintenance, and site expenses post with their category and evidence.
The point isn't more paperwork; it's that the project manager, the buyer, the yard, and the accountant are all looking at the same job. When the numbers live together, an owner can see a project drifting over budget in time to change something, instead of finding out at handover.
Purchasing, labour, plant, and expenses all post to the project, so cost is a running figure.
Requests become approved purchase orders, received and invoice-checked before payment.
Track who was deployed to which site, with attendance behind the hours.
Site vehicles and plant carry their fuel, maintenance, and document renewals.
Petty cash and site costs post against the project with their category and receipt.
Match supplier invoices to orders and receipts before they're approved for payment.
Commit spend through approvals, so buying power is delegated deliberately.
Read cost by project across materials, labour, plant, and expenses.
Yes. Purchasing, labour, plant, and expenses all post against the project, so project cost is a running figure rather than something worked out at handover — which is what lets an owner react to a job drifting over budget in time to change something.
A purchase request becomes an approved purchase order before it's committed, goods are received against it, and the supplier invoice is checked against the order and the receipt before payment. That closes the two classic leaks — buying without authority and paying for what never arrived.
Yes. Manpower deployment tracks who was on which site with attendance behind the hours, and site vehicles and plant carry their fuel, maintenance, and document renewals — all posting to the project cost.
Yes. Projects, branches, and sites are first-class, so purchasing, crews, and costs stay separated by job while an owner reads across all of them.
Usually Procurement and Manpower first — controlled buying and crew deployment are where the biggest leaks are — then Fleet, Expenses, and Analytics as the project-cost picture fills in. You can start with the most urgent and add the rest.
Book a walkthrough with your own project, suppliers, and crews, and watch site spend add up to a cost you can manage.